Euronext party crashing TOM’s sale
Only a few years ago, Euronext derivatives appeared a sleepy exchange – unable to deal with a new contender. Things have changed. TOM, aka the Order Machine, is in vulnerable position. It is up for sale as the owners can’t decide on the strategy. Euronext moved forward to spoil the sale of TOM.
In an ordinary notice (pdf), the exchange announced a client rebate scheme. Euronext will rebate all exchange trading fees above a certain monthly threshold. For stock options, the threshold is set at 200.000. These are contracts traded on client accounts. Liquidity providers can’t apply for this discount. The threshold for index options is lowered from the current 115k to 100k contracts.
Amazingly, the rebate scheme will be in place for two years. That’s unusual, it runs until December 31th, 2018. Euronext is saying “we are determined to defend our market and we are not afraid to be aggressive“.
Aimed at Binck
Only large brokers reach these volumes. DeGiro is the largest broker, and it certainly profits from the discount. Good for them, but from my perspective that’s not the idea behind the rebate scheme. Binck and possibly ABN AMRO trade enough volume as well.
But both of them execute on TOM and don’t get any volume rebate. Instead, as shareholders of TOM, they have to write checks every quarter to keep the business running.
Pressure on TOM
ABN AMRO and Binck could ditch TOM and switch to Euronext. In the short run, that would be a financially sound decision. One write-down, no more costly deposits for TOM and an attractive rebate scheme at Euronext. In the long run, Euronext may gradually raise prices again.
Potential buyers of TOM will be disturbed. They will notice they are dependent on the commitment of Binck and ABN to stay onboard. And both of them received an attractive proposal from Euronext. How loyal are they? Second, the only way TOM can counter the rebate scheme is to introduce something similar. That will be a burden on the profitability. The conclusion could be that TOM will never be profitable with these prices.
Euronext show themselves to be a fierce competitor after all. You could argue Euronext is cutting fees, to drive a competitor out of business. TOM will certainly be looking at this. However, this is a long shot and Euronext will stay on the safe side.
Best of Book
On the cash market, there is movement as well. Euronext introduced a Best of Book idea. Liquidity providers will quote stocks for retail investors only. These retail liquidity providers commit themselves to quote at least the EBBO (European Best Bid and Offer) of all lit venues.
Retail investors who want to cross the spread, get a better deal. Also, investors are certain there isn’t a better price somewhere else (like BATS). Four years ago this was proposed as “retail matching facility“. Wasn’t enthusiast at the time.
Right now I see the possibilities. Achieving best execution was never so easy. On the downside, the regular book could be less liquid and some questions are still open. If the regular book and the “best of book” market are the same, who is first in the queue?
First post: moggel
The shareholders of TOM can’t close or otherise “ditch” this exchange any time soon. They provide a platform for trading options that in a very strict sense only exist on TOM. So long as there are TOM options that haven’t expired, TOM can’t shut down their exchange.
As for the Best of Book, nice in theory, but essentially you can think of it as a Smart Order Router restricted to (small) retail orders. For that you can also use the Smart Order Router developed by TOM. Their SOR is not perfect when you use it for large orders in illiquid stocks. But for small orders, it’s fine.
congratulations to Euronext!
The fold at Optvr must be loving the game of chess going on. They are not disturbed by it, they feed on solving issues like this tactfully.
A headhunter told that IMC is not doing so well and closing the Zug office. Is this true? Why is amsterdamtrader not reporting on this?
Tibra results for 2015-2016
http://www.afr.com/business/banking-and-finance/financial-services/australian-flash-boys-tibra-capital-record-bumper-profit-20161205-gt4qle
Really happy to see these awesome results for Tibra. It’s good to see the ozzie money maker is back on top again.
IMC Zug used to be called ‘Source Capital’ and yes they’ve closed down it’s been about a year or so.
No, they are two different entities. Source was owned by Pieter van Hasselt. IMC by IMC
Berry must have made a fortune, he pretty much owns all the shares these days dont he?
@bhandari: I think Glenn Williamson still owns a big chunk of Tibra, given they’re now trading out of his grannyflat in Wollongong.
welcome back Danny! – btw you still trying to offload your shares like you were back 2011 doing rounds with the Goldmans exec?
You are correct, Glenn owns about 40% of tibra these days.
which of the starting 7 still own tibra shares?
Only C.M sold all his shares, the rest have kept some or all of their shares.
What about James Scott Tydeman – didn’t he end up ‘selling’ all his shares?
http://pastebin.com/jaD61QeE
“James Scott tydeman” is not one of the founders of tibra.
He sold all his shares back to tibra indeed.
Bhandari is still the majority shareholder with 60% at least
I think Bhandari owns even more than that, probably around 100%
I heard it’s 99.94
Yeah makes sense and then Glenn Williamson’s stake makes up for the remaining 60%.